Skip to main content

Best way to exclude unset fields from nested FastAPI model response

Assuming I have Pydantic-based FastAPI models similar to:

class Filter(BaseModel, extra=Extra.forbid):
    expression: str | None
    kind: str | None
    ...

class Configuration(BaseModel):
    filter: Filter | None = {}
    ....

By default a model that is sent nothing for the filter will end up exporting like this:

{
   "filter": {
       "expression": None,
       "kind": None,
       ...
   },
   ...
}

What I want instead is this:

{
   "filter": {},
   ...
}

What is the best way to have the nested model always have the exclude_unset behavior when exporting?

Sometimes in a complicated model I want some nested models to exclude unset fields but other ones to include them. I'm aware of exclude_unset and response_model_exclude_unset, but both affect the entire model.

It feels like there should be a way to specify behavior for a nested model and have the be consistently respected, but I can't find how to do this. Is there a better way to approach this?



source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76105056/best-way-to-exclude-unset-fields-from-nested-fastapi-model-response

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ValueError: X has 10 features, but LinearRegression is expecting 1 features as input

So, I am trying to predict the model but its throwing error like it has 10 features but it expacts only 1. So I am confused can anyone help me with it? more importantly its not working for me when my friend runs it. It works perfectly fine dose anyone know the reason about it? cv = KFold(n_splits = 10) all_loss = [] for i in range(9): # 1st for loop over polynomial orders poly_order = i X_train = make_polynomial(x, poly_order) loss_at_order = [] # initiate a set to collect loss for CV for train_index, test_index in cv.split(X_train): print('TRAIN:', train_index, 'TEST:', test_index) X_train_cv, X_test_cv = X_train[train_index], X_test[test_index] t_train_cv, t_test_cv = t[train_index], t[test_index] reg.fit(X_train_cv, t_train_cv) loss_at_order.append(np.mean((t_test_cv - reg.predict(X_test_cv))**2)) # collect loss at fold all_loss.append(np.mean(loss_at_order)) # collect loss at order plt.plot(np.log(al...

Sorting large arrays of big numeric stings

I was solving bigSorting() problem from hackerrank: Consider an array of numeric strings where each string is a positive number with anywhere from to digits. Sort the array's elements in non-decreasing, or ascending order of their integer values and return the sorted array. I know it works as follows: def bigSorting(unsorted): return sorted(unsorted, key=int) But I didnt guess this approach earlier. Initially I tried below: def bigSorting(unsorted): int_unsorted = [int(i) for i in unsorted] int_sorted = sorted(int_unsorted) return [str(i) for i in int_sorted] However, for some of the test cases, it was showing time limit exceeded. Why is it so? PS: I dont know exactly what those test cases were as hacker rank does not reveal all test cases. source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73007397/sorting-large-arrays-of-big-numeric-stings

How to load Javascript with imported modules?

I am trying to import modules from tensorflowjs, and below is my code. test.html <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Document</title </head> <body> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@tensorflow/tfjs@2.0.0/dist/tf.min.js"></script> <script type="module" src="./test.js"></script> </body> </html> test.js import * as tf from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs"; import {loadGraphModel} from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs-converter"; const MODEL_URL = './model.json'; const model = await loadGraphModel(MODEL_URL); const cat = document.getElementById('cat'); model.execute(tf.browser.fromPixels(cat)); Besides, I run the server using python -m http.server in my command prompt(Windows 10), and this is the error prompt in the console log of my browser: Failed to loa...