Skip to main content

facebook-business | Update from 10->12

Does anyone know what could be causing this depreciation issue (act_******** technically is an actual number, but hiding it from the question)?

 Message: Call was not successful
  Method:  POST
  Path:    https://graph.facebook.com/v10.0/act_*********/insights
  Params:  {'date_preset': 'today', 'action_attribution_windows': '["1d_click"]', 'level': 'ad', 'limit': '1000', 'status': '["ACTIVE"]', 'fields': '["account_id","account_name","action_values","actions","ad_id","ad_name","adset_id","adset_name","campaign_id","campaign_name","clicks","cpc","cpm","ctr","date_start","date_stop","impressions","inline_link_clicks","reach","spend","website_purchase_roas"]'}

I'm running a script that makes requests every hour to FB Marketing API from an EC2 instance. I use the following packages:

from facebook_business.api import FacebookAdsApi

from facebook_business.adobjects.ad import Ad
from facebook_business.adobjects.adset import AdSet
from facebook_business.adobjects.user import User
from facebook_business.adobjects.campaign import Campaign
from facebook_business.adobjects.adaccount import AdAccount
from facebook_business.adobjects.adsinsights import AdsInsights
from facebook_business.adobjects.adreportrun import AdReportRun

And they have been updated to version 12.0:

facebook-business 12.0.0

This is the script that runs every hour:

    if str(kwargs['timeframe']) == 'hourly':
        # Looping through AdAccount ids:
        for account in KEYS['ACCOUNT_IDs']:
            print(f'Hourly calls - Loading account: {account}')

            # Fetching ad insights without async on:
            ads = AdAccount(account).get_insights(
                params=kwargs['params'],
                fields=kwargs['fields'],
                is_async=True)
            ads.api_get()

            # While loop to verify that async is done:
            while ads[AdReportRun.Field.async_status] != 'Job Completed':
                time.sleep(1)
                print(ads.api_get())
                if ads[AdReportRun.Field.async_status] == 'Job Failed':
                    break
                else:
                    continue

            counter += 1
            print(f'Daily active calls, counter: {counter}')

            insights = str(ads.get_result(
                params={"limit": 1000},
                fields=ad_fields))

            # Replacing extra string and converting into JSON:
            df_normalized = json.loads(insights.replace('<AdsInsights>', ''))
            print(f'Ad Insights: {df_normalized}')

            # Appending response to main df:
            df = df.append(df_normalized, ignore_index=True)

            time.sleep(.75)

Weirdly enough, if I run this locally in my laptop it runs normally after upgrading the package. I did update in my app under "Settings"->"Advanced" to use version 12.0 on both Upgrade All Calls and Upgrade Calls for App Roles.

I noticed that my Path is still calling an older version (10.0) maybe updating that will do the trick? If yes, how can I update that? However, why wouldn't this call it when running locally in my laptop?

Thanks in advance!!



source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69352900/facebook-business-update-from-10-12

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Confusion between commands.Bot and discord.Client | Which one should I use?

Whenever you look at YouTube tutorials or code from this website there is a real variation. Some developers use client = discord.Client(intents=intents) while the others use bot = commands.Bot(command_prefix="something", intents=intents) . Now I know slightly about the difference but I get errors from different places from my code when I use either of them and its confusing. Especially since there has a few changes over the years in discord.py it is hard to find the real difference. I tried sticking to discord.Client then I found that there are more features in commands.Bot . Then I found errors when using commands.Bot . An example of this is: When I try to use commands.Bot client = commands.Bot(command_prefix=">",intents=intents) async def load(): for filename in os.listdir("./Cogs"): if filename.endswith(".py"): client.load_extension(f"Cogs.{filename[:-3]}") The above doesnt giveany response from my Cogs ...

How to show number of registered users in Laravel based on usertype?

i'm trying to display data from the database in the admin dashboard i used this: <?php use Illuminate\Support\Facades\DB; $users = DB::table('users')->count(); echo $users; ?> and i have successfully get the correct data from the database but what if i want to display a specific data for example in this user table there is "usertype" that specify if the user is normal user or admin i want to user the same code above but to display a specific usertype i tried this: <?php use Illuminate\Support\Facades\DB; $users = DB::table('users')->count()->WHERE usertype =admin; echo $users; ?> but it didn't work, what am i doing wrong? source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68199726/how-to-show-number-of-registered-users-in-laravel-based-on-usertype

Where and how is this Laravel kernel constructor called? [closed]

Where and how is this Laravel kernel constructor called? public fucntion __construct(Application $app, $Router $roouter) { } I have read the documentation and some online tutorial but I can find any clear explanation. I am learning Laravel and I am wondering where does this kernel constructor receives its arguments from. "POSTMOTERM" CLARIFICATION: Here is more clarity.I have checked the boostrap/app.php and it is only used for boostrapping the interfaces into the container class. What is not clear to me is where and how the Kernel class is instatiated and the arguments passed to the object calling the constructor.Something similar to; obj = new kernel(arg1,arg2) or, is the framework using some magic functions somewhere? Special gratitude to those who burn their eyeballs and brain cells on this trivia before it goes into a full blown menopause alias "MARKED AS DUPLICATE". To some of the itchy-finger keyboard warriors, a.k.a The mods,because I believe in th...