Skip to main content

Dictionary behaves like a global variable

A dictionary that I pass as an argument seems to behave like a global variable. This was a surprise to me but it seems that it makes sense in Python (see for instance this topic). However, I'm very surprised that I get a different behavior for a different type of variable. Let assume that I have a script main.py that calls two functions from a module.

import mymodule

an_int = 42
a_dict = {'value':42}

mymodule.print_and_reassign(a_dict, an_int)
mymodule.print_again(a_dict, an_int)

with my modules.py containing the following functions

def print_and_reassign(a_dict, an_int):

    # Dictionary
    print(f"Dictionary value: {a_dict['value']}")
    a_dict['value']=970

    # Integer
    print(f"Integer value: {an_int}")
    an_int=970


def print_again(a_dict, an_int):

    # Dictionary
    print(f"Dictionary value: {a_dict['value']}")

    # Integer
    print(f"Integer value: {an_int}")

By running main.py, I get the following results

Dictionnary value: 42
Integer value: 42
Dictionnary value: 970
Integer value: 42

This is very counterintuitive to me. Why does the dictionary changed while the integer remains unchanged?



source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73547620/dictionary-behaves-like-a-global-variable

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ValueError: X has 10 features, but LinearRegression is expecting 1 features as input

So, I am trying to predict the model but its throwing error like it has 10 features but it expacts only 1. So I am confused can anyone help me with it? more importantly its not working for me when my friend runs it. It works perfectly fine dose anyone know the reason about it? cv = KFold(n_splits = 10) all_loss = [] for i in range(9): # 1st for loop over polynomial orders poly_order = i X_train = make_polynomial(x, poly_order) loss_at_order = [] # initiate a set to collect loss for CV for train_index, test_index in cv.split(X_train): print('TRAIN:', train_index, 'TEST:', test_index) X_train_cv, X_test_cv = X_train[train_index], X_test[test_index] t_train_cv, t_test_cv = t[train_index], t[test_index] reg.fit(X_train_cv, t_train_cv) loss_at_order.append(np.mean((t_test_cv - reg.predict(X_test_cv))**2)) # collect loss at fold all_loss.append(np.mean(loss_at_order)) # collect loss at order plt.plot(np.log(al...

Sorting large arrays of big numeric stings

I was solving bigSorting() problem from hackerrank: Consider an array of numeric strings where each string is a positive number with anywhere from to digits. Sort the array's elements in non-decreasing, or ascending order of their integer values and return the sorted array. I know it works as follows: def bigSorting(unsorted): return sorted(unsorted, key=int) But I didnt guess this approach earlier. Initially I tried below: def bigSorting(unsorted): int_unsorted = [int(i) for i in unsorted] int_sorted = sorted(int_unsorted) return [str(i) for i in int_sorted] However, for some of the test cases, it was showing time limit exceeded. Why is it so? PS: I dont know exactly what those test cases were as hacker rank does not reveal all test cases. source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73007397/sorting-large-arrays-of-big-numeric-stings

How to load Javascript with imported modules?

I am trying to import modules from tensorflowjs, and below is my code. test.html <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Document</title </head> <body> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@tensorflow/tfjs@2.0.0/dist/tf.min.js"></script> <script type="module" src="./test.js"></script> </body> </html> test.js import * as tf from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs"; import {loadGraphModel} from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs-converter"; const MODEL_URL = './model.json'; const model = await loadGraphModel(MODEL_URL); const cat = document.getElementById('cat'); model.execute(tf.browser.fromPixels(cat)); Besides, I run the server using python -m http.server in my command prompt(Windows 10), and this is the error prompt in the console log of my browser: Failed to loa...