Skip to main content

Can you efficiently analyse the type of method parameters in Python

I am making a PyCharm plugin that will generate code examples based on a Python class. The user will be able to select a class and the plugin will generate code examples that utilise the attributes and methods of the class.

Basic Class

class Rectangle:
    
    # Hardcoded values
    width = 5
    length = 10
    
    def calculate_area(self):
        return self.width*self.length

Basic Example

r = Rectangle()
r.calculate_area()

The problem arises when the class contains methods that take parameters. For example, if the class contains a method that takes a string parameter, then I want the generated examples to pass either an empty or a random string to the method. Is there a good way to analyse the potential type of the parameters (when not strongly defined) to generate code examples?

Potential Solutions

So far I have come up with 2 applicable solutions (passing None parameters when calling the method is not applicable):

  1. A potential solution would be to keep track of the parameters and analyse the operations that they use/are used in to determine their type. In the code below num will most likely be an integer, as determined by the method body:
def calculate_even(num):
    return num % 2 == 0
  1. I know that you can execute a string containing Python code and check if it compiles correctly (source). A possible solution (one that I would love to avoid) is to generate code examples, passing different types as method parameters and determining which ones work after executing said code examples.

I can see huge downsides with both solutions, as the first one will require the handling of lots of operations for the different types and will still most likely be inaccurate, and the second one becomes incredibly slow for methods that take multiple parameters. I am really hoping that there's a more elegant solution that I have missed.



source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/75440251/can-you-efficiently-analyse-the-type-of-method-parameters-in-python

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to show number of registered users in Laravel based on usertype?

i'm trying to display data from the database in the admin dashboard i used this: <?php use Illuminate\Support\Facades\DB; $users = DB::table('users')->count(); echo $users; ?> and i have successfully get the correct data from the database but what if i want to display a specific data for example in this user table there is "usertype" that specify if the user is normal user or admin i want to user the same code above but to display a specific usertype i tried this: <?php use Illuminate\Support\Facades\DB; $users = DB::table('users')->count()->WHERE usertype =admin; echo $users; ?> but it didn't work, what am i doing wrong? source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68199726/how-to-show-number-of-registered-users-in-laravel-based-on-usertype

Why is my reports service not connecting?

I am trying to pull some data from a Postgres database using Node.js and node-postures but I can't figure out why my service isn't connecting. my routes/index.js file: const express = require('express'); const router = express.Router(); const ordersCountController = require('../controllers/ordersCountController'); const ordersController = require('../controllers/ordersController'); const weeklyReportsController = require('../controllers/weeklyReportsController'); router.get('/orders_count', ordersCountController); router.get('/orders', ordersController); router.get('/weekly_reports', weeklyReportsController); module.exports = router; My controllers/weeklyReportsController.js file: const weeklyReportsService = require('../services/weeklyReportsService'); const weeklyReportsController = async (req, res) => { try { const data = await weeklyReportsService; res.json({data}) console...

ValueError: X has 10 features, but LinearRegression is expecting 1 features as input

So, I am trying to predict the model but its throwing error like it has 10 features but it expacts only 1. So I am confused can anyone help me with it? more importantly its not working for me when my friend runs it. It works perfectly fine dose anyone know the reason about it? cv = KFold(n_splits = 10) all_loss = [] for i in range(9): # 1st for loop over polynomial orders poly_order = i X_train = make_polynomial(x, poly_order) loss_at_order = [] # initiate a set to collect loss for CV for train_index, test_index in cv.split(X_train): print('TRAIN:', train_index, 'TEST:', test_index) X_train_cv, X_test_cv = X_train[train_index], X_test[test_index] t_train_cv, t_test_cv = t[train_index], t[test_index] reg.fit(X_train_cv, t_train_cv) loss_at_order.append(np.mean((t_test_cv - reg.predict(X_test_cv))**2)) # collect loss at fold all_loss.append(np.mean(loss_at_order)) # collect loss at order plt.plot(np.log(al...