Skip to main content

Why does __DIR__, __FILE__ return basename instead of full path?

I migrate sites powered by wordpress, joomla, etc... to another hosting platform. Sometimes __DIR__ and __FILE__ constants return only basename, i.e. if a file is located under /var/www/site.com/public/index.php, the constants will return public and index.php respectively. I know the constants should return full path and a simple script could prove it:

~/tmp/src> cat index.php lib/curl.php
<?php
var_dump(__DIR__, __FILE__);
require_once("lib/curl.php");
<?php
var_dump(__DIR__, __FILE__);

~/tmp/src> php index.php
string(20) "/home/damage/tmp/src"
string(30) "/home/damage/tmp/src/index.php"
string(24) "/home/damage/tmp/src/lib"
string(33) "/home/damage/tmp/src/lib/curl.php"

When the constants are var_dump'ed in some wordpress plugin file on the hosting platform, somehow they point to basename of the file/directory. It happens with joomla too, for instance the code:

$backtrace = \debug_backtrace();
$callPath = $backtrace[0]['file'] ?? '';
var_dump($callPath);

returns different strings on each invocation.

string(88) "{site_root}/templates/shaper_helixultimate/html/modules.php"
string(11) "modules.php"

I can not share the code, anyway it is a big project. The hosting is running apache/2.4.46 (centos) and php 7.4.19. I could assume it is with hosting's apache/php configuration but have no clue which option it might be. Any advice in which direction should I go is highly appreciated.



source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69743432/why-does-dir-file-return-basename-instead-of-full-path

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ValueError: X has 10 features, but LinearRegression is expecting 1 features as input

So, I am trying to predict the model but its throwing error like it has 10 features but it expacts only 1. So I am confused can anyone help me with it? more importantly its not working for me when my friend runs it. It works perfectly fine dose anyone know the reason about it? cv = KFold(n_splits = 10) all_loss = [] for i in range(9): # 1st for loop over polynomial orders poly_order = i X_train = make_polynomial(x, poly_order) loss_at_order = [] # initiate a set to collect loss for CV for train_index, test_index in cv.split(X_train): print('TRAIN:', train_index, 'TEST:', test_index) X_train_cv, X_test_cv = X_train[train_index], X_test[test_index] t_train_cv, t_test_cv = t[train_index], t[test_index] reg.fit(X_train_cv, t_train_cv) loss_at_order.append(np.mean((t_test_cv - reg.predict(X_test_cv))**2)) # collect loss at fold all_loss.append(np.mean(loss_at_order)) # collect loss at order plt.plot(np.log(al...

Sorting large arrays of big numeric stings

I was solving bigSorting() problem from hackerrank: Consider an array of numeric strings where each string is a positive number with anywhere from to digits. Sort the array's elements in non-decreasing, or ascending order of their integer values and return the sorted array. I know it works as follows: def bigSorting(unsorted): return sorted(unsorted, key=int) But I didnt guess this approach earlier. Initially I tried below: def bigSorting(unsorted): int_unsorted = [int(i) for i in unsorted] int_sorted = sorted(int_unsorted) return [str(i) for i in int_sorted] However, for some of the test cases, it was showing time limit exceeded. Why is it so? PS: I dont know exactly what those test cases were as hacker rank does not reveal all test cases. source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73007397/sorting-large-arrays-of-big-numeric-stings

How to load Javascript with imported modules?

I am trying to import modules from tensorflowjs, and below is my code. test.html <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>Document</title </head> <body> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@tensorflow/tfjs@2.0.0/dist/tf.min.js"></script> <script type="module" src="./test.js"></script> </body> </html> test.js import * as tf from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs"; import {loadGraphModel} from "./node_modules/@tensorflow/tfjs-converter"; const MODEL_URL = './model.json'; const model = await loadGraphModel(MODEL_URL); const cat = document.getElementById('cat'); model.execute(tf.browser.fromPixels(cat)); Besides, I run the server using python -m http.server in my command prompt(Windows 10), and this is the error prompt in the console log of my browser: Failed to loa...